Posted on

[DISCLAIMER: I realize “Hollywood” is not an individual, but I use the term as such in the way many people do: to speak of an approach to film making that seems to be acceptable to the powers that be in the Hollywood movie-making industry.]

I recently watched an excellent movie called “The Finest Hours” about the most daring successful small boat rescue mission in US Coast Guard history. Four men went out on a small boat in 60-to-70-foot waves during a nor’easter to save some men who were stranded on an oil tanker that had split in half. It happened in 1952.

As these four heroes navigated the seas that could easily have killed them, they sang a song to calm their nerves. In the movie, they sang a seafaring song. In real life, they sang the hymn “Rock of Ages.”

According to an article at (, “[w]ith some exceptions for the sake of dramatic tension and concise storytelling, the script largely sticks to its source material, Michael J. Tougias and Casey Sherman’s 2010 book The Finest Hours: The True Story of the U.S. Coast Guard’s Most Daring Sea Rescue.” The linked article’s comparisons of key moments from the actual rescue mission to their portrayals in the film reveals this movie to have done a better job of telling the true story than most films seem to do. But why change the song the men sang? That does nothing to help the storytelling process.

This is what Hollywood so often does. They create a world in which true, dependent faith in God does not exist in normal people, and especially not in heroes. In this view of the world, only those on the fringe have any real relationship with Jesus; those with a  faith that actually affects things like morality, decision making, and life goals are typically viewed as extremists. The changing of the song in this particular film is but one example of that. Why change the song when so much of the script remained true to the events as they actually happened? Nothing is done in the making of a film without there being a reason for doing it, so what was the reason for this?

I suspect that most movie goers would have no problem with a genuine Christian being portrayed as such–they would have no issue with four men singing a hymn to God as a means of steeling their courage–as long as those movie goers don’t feel like they’re being fed propaganda. However, they actually are being fed propaganda., and years of such feedings seem to have resulted in a culture wherein the younger people who were raised with this propagandist view of “reality” have come to believe it actually is reality.

As a person whose life is built upon faith in Jesus and knows what He can do when a life is surrendered to Him, I am saddened by what Hollywood’s typical portrayal of faith unknowingly has in store for culture and for the destinies (both temporal and eternal) of individuals. A culture that removes God from its consciousness is a culture that will end up groping in dark enslavement. But Jesus is the Light, and embracing His truth will set you free. He is “the way, the truth, and the life,” the only way to God (John 14:6). He changes lives for the better, and He gives eternal life to all who believe in Him. Sadly, many have been conditioned to get the “heebie jeebies” around anyone who would speak of such things, things that have long been prominent in Western culture.

Hollywood has been a big part of my life. Going to the movies is one of my favorite things to do. But, with few exceptions, its portrayals of God and those who know Him through faith in Jesus are largely inaccurate. Maybe Hollywood filmmakers are just not any better at telling that true story than they are of telling most other true stories.


Who defines evil?

Posted on Updated on

Who defines evil?

The book of Judges in the Old Testament contains an oft-repeated statement: “And the people of Israel again did what was evil in the sight of the LORD.” In fact, the story of the book of Judges is one of Israel turning away from God, God delivering them into the hands of an enemy, Israel eventually crying out to God for deliverance, and God raising up a leader–a judge–to lead Israel to victory and into a time of walking with God. This cycle runs throughout the book.

God never applied His hand of discipline to Israel for doing what was evil in the eyes of their culture. He never did so for their doing what was evil as determined by polling data. Nor did He do so for their doing what was evil per the influential pundits of the day. Israel faced discipline from the hand of the LORD for doing what was evil in the sight of the LORD.

Mankind does not have the luxury of defining what is evil, nor do countries, regions, states, cities, communities, social groups, or individuals. If God considers something to be evil, then it is evil, even if only one person out of seven billion would agree with God. In fact, even if NO person agreed with God, His definition of evil would still stand. Man may decide to call evil good, but it remains, in fact, evil, for the One who will judge everyone considers it so. We all stand before God on the basis of HIS standard, not any standard of our own. Mankind may try to vote God out; they may try to storm the castle; they may try to let the Supreme Court decide. But if God calls something evil, it is evil.

The beautiful thing, though, is that we who have a proclivity for evil (i.e., sin) are made perfectly righteous in the sight of God when we trust in the sacrifice made for our sins by Jesus on the cross–in other words, when we receive Jesus as our Savior–when we believe on the Lord Jesus Christ. He bore our sin so that we might take on His righteousness, even though, in practice, we still sin. Wonder of wonders, if not for this salvation that comes only through faith in Jesus, we would all have no hope at all, for we are so quick to run to what God calls evil. Have you received Jesus as YOUR Savior?


How Should Evangelicals Respond to the Current Cultural Climate?

Posted on Updated on

Dear Fellow Evangelical Christians:

In the eyes of man, I am a nobody from nowhere. I pastor a very small church. Some of you host small groups in your homes that are larger than the congregation before which I stand each Sunday. Some might thus consider me unqualified to write what is something of an open letter to evangelicals. Well, sorry, but I have something to say that I think needs to be said about the way many of us are responding to the culture that is changing rapidly around us. I speak from an American perspective, but these principles apply across all cultures and time periods. Here goes.

Liberals are not our enemy. Muslims are not our enemy. Homosexuals are not our enemy. Transgenders are not our enemy. Atheists are not our enemy. Some from among these groups and others may hate us, but they are not our enemy. And to be frank, some of us hate some of them, which is not our right to do, given who our Lord is and who we are apart from Him.

You may think you are better than people in the groups I have listed, but you are not, nor am I. Viewing people as our enemies tends to puff up our pride and give us a sense of superiority, which is hideously unChristlike.

So who is our enemy? If you know your Bible, you should not have to think very hard to answer that one. But just in case, here’s a hint: Ephesians 6:12. Look it up. It says we do not wrestle with flesh and blood. What are liberals, Muslims, homosexuals, transgenders, atheists, and others? Flesh and blood! I don’t think I have to spell it out, here.

Now, of course, if we embrace the Bible as God’s word (which is essential to evangelicalism), we will disagree with many things espoused by these various groups. Some things with which we disagree we will even call sin because the Bible calls them sin. Disagreeing is not hating, nor does it require hate. We may be accused of hate for disagreeing, but we cannot control what people think of us. All we can do is respond as Christ would have us respond. If our response is good with Him, then it is good, period. And so what should our response be? The apostle Peter gives us good instruction on this:

“. . . in your hearts honor Christ the Lord as holy, always being prepared to make a defense to anyone who asks you for a reason for the hope that is in you; yet do it with gentleness and respect, having a good conscience, so that, when you are slandered, those who revile your good behavior in Christ may be put to shame” (1 Peter 3:15-16, ESV).

Notice those words “gentleness and respect.” Do we respond that way? I hear a lot of us not doing so, and there are times when that includes me. But even when we are imperfect in this, we must not justify our bad behavior and somehow view it as sanctified. Rather, we must repent and purpose by the grace of God to respond properly the next time. We may even need to humble ourselves and apologize for how we said something. Apologizing doesn’t mean you have to surrender the point under discussion. You can simply say something like, “I do hold to the point I was trying to make, but I was out of line in how I made it, and I’m sorry.” Gentleness and respect.

Notice that Peter’s comments above refer to speaking of the hope that is in us. In our cultural and political discussions with unbelievers, I wonder if that hope is often not even part of the conversation. While we are certainly going to have political and cultural opinions and engage in conversation and debate about those things, ultimately, the Lord would have us stay on message. And what is that message? Our hope in Christ.

We are ambassadors for Christ (2 Corinthians 5:20). Sometimes, a country’s ambassador may be nice and respectful and well behaved yet still be hated simply because the country he/she represents is hated. We represent Christ, who is hated by the world. His word is rejected, and His cross is an offense to the world. But our calling is to represent Him well in a world that is not our home (Philippians 3:20-21). This calls for us to don the armor of God (Ephesians 6:10ff) so that we might stand against our true enemy–the enemy of our souls–and speak the truth, yes, but the truth in love (Ephesians 4:15). Because, after all, Christ has not called us to drive people away from Him, a sad consequence that sometimes follows our attempts to maintain a culture that is to our liking, one with which we are comfortable. He has called us to serve in His rescue mission to the very people we sometimes treat like enemies.