Month: June 2017


Posted on

[DISCLAIMER: I realize “Hollywood” is not an individual, but I use the term as such in the way many people do: to speak of an approach to film making that seems to be acceptable to the powers that be in the Hollywood movie-making industry.]

I recently watched an excellent movie called “The Finest Hours” about the most daring successful small boat rescue mission in US Coast Guard history. Four men went out on a small boat in 60-to-70-foot waves during a nor’easter to save some men who were stranded on an oil tanker that had split in half. It happened in 1952.

As these four heroes navigated the seas that could easily have killed them, they sang a song to calm their nerves. In the movie, they sang a seafaring song. In real life, they sang the hymn “Rock of Ages.”

According to an article at (, “[w]ith some exceptions for the sake of dramatic tension and concise storytelling, the script largely sticks to its source material, Michael J. Tougias and Casey Sherman’s 2010 book The Finest Hours: The True Story of the U.S. Coast Guard’s Most Daring Sea Rescue.” The linked article’s comparisons of key moments from the actual rescue mission to their portrayals in the film reveals this movie to have done a better job of telling the true story than most films seem to do. But why change the song the men sang? That does nothing to help the storytelling process.

This is what Hollywood so often does. They create a world in which true, dependent faith in God does not exist in normal people, and especially not in heroes. In this view of the world, only those on the fringe have any real relationship with Jesus; those with a  faith that actually affects things like morality, decision making, and life goals are typically viewed as extremists. The changing of the song in this particular film is but one example of that. Why change the song when so much of the script remained true to the events as they actually happened? Nothing is done in the making of a film without there being a reason for doing it, so what was the reason for this?

I suspect that most movie goers would have no problem with a genuine Christian being portrayed as such–they would have no issue with four men singing a hymn to God as a means of steeling their courage–as long as those movie goers don’t feel like they’re being fed propaganda. However, they actually are being fed propaganda., and years of such feedings seem to have resulted in a culture wherein the younger people who were raised with this propagandist view of “reality” have come to believe it actually is reality.

As a person whose life is built upon faith in Jesus and knows what He can do when a life is surrendered to Him, I am saddened by what Hollywood’s typical portrayal of faith unknowingly has in store for culture and for the destinies (both temporal and eternal) of individuals. A culture that removes God from its consciousness is a culture that will end up groping in dark enslavement. But Jesus is the Light, and embracing His truth will set you free. He is “the way, the truth, and the life,” the only way to God (John 14:6). He changes lives for the better, and He gives eternal life to all who believe in Him. Sadly, many have been conditioned to get the “heebie jeebies” around anyone who would speak of such things, things that have long been prominent in Western culture.

Hollywood has been a big part of my life. Going to the movies is one of my favorite things to do. But, with few exceptions, its portrayals of God and those who know Him through faith in Jesus are largely inaccurate. Maybe Hollywood filmmakers are just not any better at telling that true story than they are of telling most other true stories.